150,071 Live Verified Cameras • Nationwide Master Registry

Flock Camera LocationsLive Interactive Map & 50-State ALPR Database

Looking for Flock camera locations in your city, neighborhood, or daily commute? FlockCamerasMap provides the United States’ definitive, independent, and community-verified intelligence database of Flock Safety camera locations and automated license plate readers (ALPR). With over 140,815 verified locations mapped across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, our GIS platform enables citizens, privacy researchers, and journalists to track public infrastructure, inspect police sharing networks, and review state-by-state surveillance statutory laws.

Live Flock Camera Locations GIS Map

Pan, zoom, or search to inspect genuine coordinates and azimuth orientation angles of 150,071+ cameras.

Initializing GIS Spatial Telemetry Engine...

Connecting 150,071 verified Flock camera locations

Verified Locations
140,815

Live Geocoded Nodes

Jurisdictions Covered
50 States + DC

100% United States Footprint

Law Enforcement Agencies
1,780+

Police & Sheriff Contracts

Flock Market Share
81.0%

Falcon & Falcon Flex Models

Urban ALPR Surveillance Density

Top Metropolitan Hotspots for Flock Camera Locations

Major metropolitan regions account for the highest concentration of municipal ring perimeters and HOA federated cameras. Explore verified city hubs:

Complete 50-State Directory

Flock Camera Locations by State

Select your state to inspect full municipal deployment counts, state statutory data retention mandates, and customized FOIA public records letters.

RankState / TerritoryDocumented CamerasFlock Falcon ShareHighest-Density HubStatutory LawExplore
#1CaliforniaCA21,80079.9%San DiegoCal. Civ. Code § 1798.90.5 et seq. (SB 34); mandates strict ALPR privacy policy, usage audits, public disclosure, and prohibits sharing data out-of-state for non-qualifying purposes.View Map
#2TexasTX15,94191.6%DallasTex. Transp. Code § 707 (banned red light cameras); ALPR governed under Tex. Gov't Code § 411 and local police policies; high density across Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and Austin.View Map
#3GeorgiaGA10,16792.4%AtlantaO.C.G.A. § 35-1-22; strict statutory cap of 30-day retention for non-hit ALPR scans; requires explicit warrant/investigative log for queries.View Map
#4IllinoisIL9,39477.3%Chicago625 ILCS 5/11-208.7; expressway camera act and municipal ordinances require registration and prohibit sharing with out-of-state entities for immigration or reproductive care inquiries.View Map
#5FloridaFL9,19777.2%MiamiFla. Stat. § 316.0777 & § 316.0778; restricts ALPR data access to active criminal investigations and requires strict data destruction cycles (typically 30–90 days).View Map
#6OhioOH6,61390.7%ClevelandOhio Rev. Code § 4511.093; regulation of automated traffic cameras; Flock ALPR deployments active across Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Dayton.View Map
#7MichiganMI5,56584.4%DetroitMich. Comp. Laws § 257.627; high urban deployment across Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids; municipal policies typically set 30-day retention.View Map
#8North CarolinaNC5,11487.8%CharlotteN.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-183.30; limits ALPR data retention to 90 days for unflagged data unless connected to active criminal matter; mandates annual audit.View Map
#9IndianaIN4,49593.0%IndianapolisInd. Code § 9-21-3.5; authorizes ALPR on state highways and local roads for public safety with standard local retention policies.View Map
#10New JerseyNJ4,32838.6%Statewide CorridorN.J. Attorney General Directive 2022-12; limits ALPR retention to 5 years, requires quarterly compliance audits, and prohibits automated speeding ticketing.View Map
#11AlabamaAL4,30085.3%Statewide CorridorAla. Code § 32-5A (General Traffic); no statewide cap on non-warrant ALPR retention; individual municipal ordinances govern local PD usage.View Map
#12New YorkNY4,01955.5%Statewide CorridorN.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 50-a; NYPD and NY State Police deploy extensive ALPR networks; public records transparency governed under FOIL.View Map
#13LouisianaLA2,84380.5%New OrleansLa. Stat. Ann. § 32:41; widespread sheriff and municipal adoption with cloud data retention periods between 30 and 365 days.View Map
#14ArizonaAZ2,69483.0%PhoenixAriz. Rev. Stat. § 28-1201 et seq.; law enforcement agencies retain ALPR data with municipal retention guidelines (typically 30 to 180 days).View Map
#15ColoradoCO2,69085.2%DenverColo. Rev. Stat. § 24-72-301; ALPR records subject to Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) with municipal retention policies (typically 1 to 3 years).View Map
#16VirginiaVA2,52791.0%NorfolkVa. Code Ann. § 15.2-1716.1; allows ALPR for active criminal investigations; Supreme Court of Virginia Neal v. Fairfax County decision affirmed limits on indefinite retention of unflagged plate data.View Map
#17KansasKS2,33062.0%Statewide CorridorKan. Stat. Ann. § 22-4701; Criminal Justice Information standards apply to municipal ALPR databases.View Map
#18ArkansasAR2,20092.6%Statewide CorridorArk. Code Ann. § 12-12-1803; limits ALPR data retention to 150 days unless part of active criminal investigation.View Map
#19PennsylvaniaPA2,17529.0%Statewide Corridor75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3369; limits automated enforcement zones; PA State Police ALPR guidelines regulate non-hit data destruction.View Map
#20WashingtonWA2,04586.6%SeattleWash. Rev. Code § 46.63.170; limits automated cameras to designated safety corridors; municipal ALPR policies require strict query logging.View Map
#21MinnesotaMN2,02886.7%Statewide CorridorMinn. Stat. § 13.824; statutory cap of 60 days on unflagged ALPR data; requires biennial independent audits and public notice before deploying.View Map
#22OklahomaOK1,89687.1%Oklahoma CityOkla. Stat. tit. 47 § 11-1401; Oklahoma Uninsured Vehicle Enforcement Diversion (UVED) program uses ALPR; municipal retention rules apply.View Map
#23MarylandMD1,79581.4%Statewide CorridorMd. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 3-509; requires law enforcement audit logs, prohibits selling data, and mandates annual reporting to the General Assembly.View Map
#24TennesseeTN1,74585.7%NashvilleTenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-302; requires prominent public signage for automated camera systems; Flock deployments widespread in Nashville, Memphis, Chattanooga.View Map
#25MissouriMO1,70373.3%St. LouisMo. Rev. Stat. § 610.100 (Sunshine Law); extensive deployment across St. Louis County, Kansas City, and St. Charles; municipal retention ranges from 30 to 180 days.View Map
#26MassachusettsMA1,53584.1%Statewide CorridorMass. Gen. Laws ch. 66 § 10; public records guidelines apply; State Police policy limits unflagged data retention to 1 year.View Map
#27New MexicoNM1,36171.0%AlbuquerqueN.M. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-1 (Inspection of Public Records Act); Albuquerque PD maintains major network with local retention policies.View Map
#28KentuckyKY1,33891.6%Statewide CorridorKy. Rev. Stat. § 61.870 (Kentucky Open Records Act); municipal retention policies average 60 to 90 days.View Map
#29ConnecticutCT1,12561.7%Statewide CorridorConn. Gen. Stat. § 14-279a et seq.; municipal guidelines require strict auditing of queries and secure cloud transmission.View Map
#30UtahUT1,06475.8%Salt Lake CityUtah Code Ann. § 41-6a-2003; strictly limits ALPR retention to 9 months for government agencies, prohibits selling data, and requires strict audit logs.View Map
#31IowaIA1,00782.5%Statewide CorridorIowa Code § 321.48; prohibits unauthorized automated traffic ticketing; ALPR for criminal investigation authorized under Iowa DPS guidelines.View Map
#32OregonOR77673.3%Statewide CorridorOr. Rev. Stat. § 181A.250; limits law enforcement ALPR retention to 30 days unless subject to ongoing criminal investigation.View Map
#33DelawareDE61074.6%Statewide CorridorDel. Code tit. 11 § 8501; Delaware State Police maintains statewide ALPR network with audit logs.View Map
#34IdahoID53175.7%Statewide CorridorIdaho Code § 49-245; prohibits automated traffic enforcement without human review; ALPR investigative databases regulated under public records law.View Map
#35South CarolinaSC47092.6%Statewide CorridorS.C. Code Ann. § 56-5-6520; prohibits automated red light/speed cameras; ALPR usage restricted to active law enforcement investigations.View Map
#36NebraskaNE35275.6%Statewide CorridorNeb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,298; limits ALPR data retention to 180 days unless involved in a specific investigation; requires annual audit.View Map
#37District of ColumbiaDC29691.2%Statewide CorridorD.C. Code § 5-133.21; Metropolitan Police Department ALPR data retention policy set at 90 days for non-hit scans.View Map
#38MississippiMS22090.9%Statewide CorridorMiss. Code Ann. § 45-1-1; Mississippi Department of Public Safety and municipal police departments govern local retention schedules.View Map
#39North DakotaND9516.8%Statewide CorridorN.D. Cent. Code § 39-03-09; law enforcement ALPR databases regulated under state criminal justice guidelines.View Map
#40HawaiiHI8970.8%Statewide CorridorHaw. Rev. Stat. § 92F; Uniform Information Practices Act governs municipal surveillance transparency.View Map
#41MaineME6867.6%Statewide CorridorMe. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A § 2117-A; limits ALPR retention to 21 days for unflagged scans; prohibits commercial use and requires strict access logs.View Map
#42WyomingWY6892.6%Statewide CorridorWyo. Stat. Ann. § 31-5-103; municipal police departments adhere to standard state public records guidelines.View Map
#43New HampshireNH6711.9%Statewide CorridorN.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 261:75-b; strictly bans automated license plate readers on public roads except for narrow law enforcement exceptions.View Map
#44West VirginiaWV5886.2%Statewide CorridorW. Va. Code § 17C-6-7a; prohibits automated photo traffic ticketing; ALPR for criminal investigation authorized under state police oversight.View Map
#45MontanaMT4173.2%Statewide CorridorMont. Code Ann. § 46-5-117; prohibits government surveillance technology on private citizens without warrant or specific statutory authority.View Map
#46South DakotaSD3357.6%Statewide CorridorS.D. Codified Laws § 32-33-1; municipal guidelines govern traffic surveillance.View Map
#47AlaskaAK616.7%Statewide CorridorAlaska Stat. § 12.36 (Criminal Justice Information); privacy protected under Alaska Constitution Art. I § 22.View Map
#48NevadaNV10.0%Las VegasNev. Rev. Stat. § 484A.600; heavy deployment across Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) and Reno with municipal auditing protocols.View Map
#49Rhode IslandRI0NaN%Statewide CorridorR.I. Gen. Laws § 31-41.2; school zone and traffic monitoring guidelines apply.View Map
#50VermontVT0NaN%Statewide Corridor23 V.S.A. § 1607; limits ALPR data retention to 18 months, requires annual reporting to legislature, and mandates strict criminal justice purpose for all queries.View Map
#51WisconsinWI0NaN%MilwaukeeWis. Stat. § 349.02; limits automated enforcement without officer involvement; Milwaukee and suburban police departments utilize Flock ALPR under local department retention rules.View Map
Comprehensive 2026 Architectural Dossier

The Definitive Guide to Flock Camera Locations in the United States

Automated license plate readers have reshaped American policing and suburban surveillance. Below is an exhaustive technical investigation examining how Flock camera locations are selected, how private HOA grids integrate into police dispatch systems, the legal framework governing public disclosure, and step-by-step methodologies for identifying and auditing hardware in your community.

Flock camera location on roadside pole with solar panel and infrared sensors
Field Visual Identification

How to Spot a Flock Camera Location in Plain View

Flock Safety Falcon cameras have a standardized physical profile designed for rapid deployment without municipal trenching:

  • Round Matte Black Post: Mounted 10 to 14 feet above grade on a dedicated steel pole, streetlight, or utility standard.
  • 25-Watt Solar Array: A compact rectangular overhead solar panel tilted at 30° to 45° to catch maximum daylight.
  • Cylindrical Sensor Housing: A compact black canister containing dual lenses (high-resolution color RGB and infrared) aimed toward oncoming traffic bumpers.
  • Nighttime 850nm Glow: At dusk and nighttime, an invisible infrared strobe fires, showing a faint dull cherry-red LED reflection.

01.The Anatomy of Flock Camera Locations: Where Are They Installed?

Law enforcement agencies and municipal planners do not deploy Flock cameras randomly. Deployments follow a strategic doctrine designed to maximize vehicular capture rates while creating geographic containment perimeters. The primary categories of Flock camera locations include:

Arterial Commuter Bottlenecks

High-capacity boulevards, multi-lane parkways, and river crossing bridges where traffic funneling guarantees nearly 100% vehicle capture. Multiple cameras are staggered to capture every directional lane.

Highway Ingress & Egress Ramps

Interstate and state highway exit ramps. These locations allow police to intercept stolen vehicles and AMBER alert targets as they transition from high-speed freeways into municipal surface streets.

Municipal Perimeter Ring Gates

Suburban jurisdictions deploy concentric "virtual gates" along their city boundary limits, photographing every vehicle that enters or exits the municipal jurisdiction, effectively creating a persistent border audit log.

Subdivision & HOA Entrances

Private neighborhood entryways and cul-de-sac gateways. Homeowners Associations lease Falcon units to log all resident, delivery, and guest vehicles, feeding records into regional police hotlists.

02.Public vs. Private Flock Camera Locations: The HOA-to-Police Pipeline

One of the most consequential developments in modern surveillance is the privatization of ALPR networks. While municipal police departments are constrained by city council budget approvals and public procurement hearings, private entities face no such oversight:

The TALON Warrantless Sharing Mechanism

When a private Homeowners Association or commercial shopping plaza installs a Flock camera, they enter into a Master Services Agreement with Flock Group Inc. Flock provides an opt-in checkbox enabling the HOA to federate its live video and plate detections directly to local law enforcement dispatchers through the TALON network. Because the cameras are privately owned, police gain warrantless access to residential vehicular movement without having to obtain Fourth Amendment search warrants or publish public surveillance impact reports.

Flock Safety Vehicle Fingerprint machine vision AI analyzing license plate and car traits
Machine Vision Analytics

Vehicle Fingerprint™ AI at Camera Locations

Flock camera locations do far more than read alphanumeric plate characters. Every passing vehicle triggers a high-speed inference pipeline powered by Ambarella CV25 edge vision chips:

Make, Model & Year: Classifies visual contours to identify vehicle manufacturer and body style.
Color & Finish: High-precision color chromaticity identification under variable sunlight.
Distinguishing Marks: Detects bumper stickers, roof luggage racks, tow hitches, and rear window decals.
Missing Plates: Flags vehicles with missing, obstructed, or paper temporary tags.

03.How Flock Camera Locations Are Mapped and Verified

Unlike commercial vendors who keep their deployment locations confidential, FlockCamerasMap utilizes a transparent, 4-stage data verification protocol based on open civic data:

1

OpenStreetMap Physical Ground Surveys

Field volunteers document physical roadside hardware using GPS mapping tools, tagging precise coordinates with standardized surveillance tags (`man_made=surveillance`, `surveillance:type=ALPR`, `camera:direction`).

2

Municipal Public Records & FOIA Contract Extraction

City council meeting minutes, police department procurement resolutions, and municipal Master Services Agreements frequently include installation schedules, utility pole permits, and intersection lists.

3

Satellite & Street-Level Visual Corroboration

High-resolution aerial imagery and municipal right-of-way street views verify solar panel orientation, pole alignment, and cross-street azimuth headings to ensure spatial fidelity.

4

Azimuth Heading & Traffic Lane Calculation

Every camera pin is assigned an azimuth angle (0° to 359°), indicating the exact compass direction the camera lens faces to track oncoming or departing vehicular flow.

04.Are Flock Camera Locations Public Information? State Legal Precedents

When citizens and investigative reporters file public records requests seeking Flock camera locations, police departments frequently resist disclosure, claiming that revealing camera sites would "compromise tactical law enforcement operations." However, state courts and open government statutes have consistently rejected these blanket secrecy claims:

The Landmark Ruling: EFF v. Los Angeles Police Department

In Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Superior Court (LAPD), the California Supreme Court ruled that ALPR data and records do not qualify for California’s broad "records of investigations" exemption. Because ALPR cameras record every motorist regardless of suspicion, they are automated surveillance grids rather than targeted investigations. Subsequent statutory reforms—such as California Senate Bill 34 (SB 34)—specifically mandate that agencies operating ALPR systems maintain an explicit public privacy policy, disclose operating custody, and publish usage logs.

Similarly, under the Texas Public Information Act (PIA), Florida Sunshine Law (Chapter 119), and Georgia Open Records Act, contracts between municipal councils and Flock Safety, monthly fee invoices, and pole permit attachments are indisputably public documents subject to mandatory disclosure upon request.

05.Flock Camera Deployment Category Comparison Matrix

Flock camera locations vary widely depending on who procured the hardware and where it is mounted. The table below outlines operational characteristics across the five primary deployment categories:

Deployment EntityTypical LocationPower SourceData RetentionPublic FOIA Subject?
Municipal PoliceCity thoroughfares & intersectionsSolar (25W) or AC streetlight30 days (default) to 1 yearYes (State FOIA)
County SheriffUnincorporated highway corridorsDedicated solar pole30 to 90 daysYes (County Clerk)
State DOT / Highway PatrolFreeway off-ramps & weigh stationsGrid hardwire / Heavy solarState statutory cap (e.g. 21-60 days)Yes (State Records)
Residential HOASubdivision gates & entry mediansSolar panel on private median30 days via Flock cloudExempt (Unless shared with police)
Commercial Retail PlazasBig box parking lot entrancesParking light standard mount30 days via corporate securityNo (Private Property)

Frequently Asked Questions About Flock Camera Locations

Clear, factual answers to common questions about Flock Safety cameras and automated license plate recognition.

Flock camera locations are roadside and intersection sites where automated license plate recognition (ALPR) cameras developed by Flock Safety are installed. They are most commonly mounted at arterial traffic choke points, freeway on-ramps and off-ramps, municipal perimeter borders (creating "virtual surveillance rings"), entrances to residential HOA subdivisions, and parking lot ingress/egress points of commercial shopping centers.

Related Authority Guides & Research

Deepen your understanding of automated license plate reader hardware, municipal budgets, and legal protections: